Order your ARC 2012-2013 Salon Catalogue

Click here to become a sponsor

   
Nymphs and Satyr, by William Bouguereau (Detail)
click to learn more click to learn more click to learn more
click to learn more click to learn more click to learn more
click to see upcoming exhibition information Click to visit the Living Masters Gallery Click to see the winners of the 2011-2012 ARC Salon click to see the winners of the 2012 ARC Scholarship

Categories
  • [1 post]
  • Academia and Modernism [26 posts]
  • Advice to Artists [16 posts]
  • Aesthetics [55 posts]
  • ARC Living Master Gallery Testimonials [6 posts]
  • Architecture [1 post]
  • Art and Politics [13 posts]
  • Art as a Profession [1 post]
  • Art Criticism [9 posts]
  • Art History Anecdotes [5 posts]
  • Art History Timeline [3 posts]
  • Art Practice [9 posts]
  • Art's Place in Society [27 posts]
  • Artspeak 101 [6 posts]
  • Ateliers [10 posts]
  • Bad Philosophy [1 post]
  • Book Reviews [1 post]
  • Canvas Priming or Preparation [1 post]
  • College Activism: Return to Realism [52 posts]
  • College Curricula [9 posts]
  • Commentary on Specific Artists [33 posts]
  • Definitions of Art [8 posts]
  • Digital Art [20 posts]
  • Discussion: William Bouguereau [3 posts]
  • Exhibitions [5 posts]
  • Fine Art and Photography [4 posts]
  • Freedom of Expression [6 posts]
  • Frequently Asked Questions [30 posts]
  • Funding for the Arts [1 post]
  • Good Art Versus Traditionalism [1 post]
  • Hockney Completely Refuted [53 posts]
  • Illustration as a Fine Art [27 posts]
  • Impressionism vs Academism [5 posts]
  • Juries and Competitions [1 post]
  • Letters to ARC [458 posts]
  • Life of an Artist [7 posts]
  • Modernist Heroes Reconsidered [62 posts]
  • Modernist Orthodoxy on Campus [4 posts]
  • Moral Relativism [1 post]
  • Music and Art [1 post]
  • Myth & Religion in Art [7 posts]
  • Nudity [1 post]
  • Paint Pigments [8 posts]
  • Perspective [2 posts]
  • Picasso: Discussion by experts [14 posts]
  • Places to See [1 post]
  • Post of the Week [2 posts]
  • Realism on the Rise [2 posts]
  • Regarding GoodArt and ARC [10 posts]
  • Renaissance Art [1 post]
  • Responses to ARC [4 posts]
  • Scholarship [1 post]
  • Sculpture [1 post]
  • Setting up the Studio [6 posts]
  • Students at non-ARC Approved schools [1 post]
  • Technical questions discussed and answered [6 posts]
  • Techniques: Art Manuals [1 post]
  • Techniques: Draughtsmanship [33 posts]
  • Techniques: Oil Painting [80 posts]
  • Techniques: Sculpture [2 posts]
  • The Case of Pete Panse [4 posts]
  • The Marketplace [19 posts]
  • The Origins of Modernism [6 posts]
  • What is Art? [24 posts]


  • Painters Who Write

    by Virgil Elliott

    Rubik,

    As you probably know, I am a painter who writes also, so what I said bears on my own situation as well as on Miles. I wasn't really intending it to reflect on you, as you aren't calling yourself a writer. I don't consider e-mails in a forum to be really writing, as in for a broader audience. It is more in the realm of conversation than actual writing. I'm reasonably sure that in your first language you are every bit as articulate as any of us are in ours. But as regards artists who write, they usually become known primarily for either their painting or their writing, and whichever it is in each individual case, it is most frequently to the diminishment of the other capacity, regardless of how well the latter is done.

    The ability to write well is, in my view, perhaps as rare as the ability to draw and paint well, and is becoming more so with each successive generation, at least in the U.S. I'm old enough to remember when just about everyone played a musical instrument, in addition to whatever else we did. History provides quite a few examples of artists who were also musicians. The penmanship of ordinary people when I was young and before was artistically exemplary compared to the norm today, as was the general command of the English language in English-speaking countries. It all relates to mental discipline and artistic sensibilities, which have been in general decline since television became a factor in modern culture, or so it seems to me. Thus it is that fewer and fewer people are willing or able to acknowledge the possibility that a person could actually be a master of more than one discipline, while the presumption is much more common that if a person excels at one thing, that that is the only mentally challenging endeavor he or she should attempt. While it is tempting to theorise that evolution of human intelligence has ceased, based on much of what is readily observable, I know that the potential of the human mind today is every bit what it was in the days of Leonardo. People just do not work as hard at developing it these days, at least in as great diversity as was once the case. There is no legitimate reason why people cannot master more than one thing. The fullest potential of the human brain is seldom realized.

    Virgil Elliott