Order your ARC 2014-2015 Salon Catalogue

Click here to become a sponsor

Nymphs and Satyr, by William Bouguereau (Detail)
click to learn more click to learn more click to learn more
click to learn more click to learn more click to learn more
click to see upcoming exhibition information Click to visit the Living Masters Gallery Click to see the winners of the 2016 ARC Salon click to see the winners of the 2016 ARC Scholarship

  • [1 post]
  • Academia and Modernism [26 posts]
  • Advice to Artists [16 posts]
  • Aesthetics [55 posts]
  • ARC Living Master, Artist, and Sponsor Testimonials [11 posts]
  • ARC Scholarship Thank You Letters [4 posts]
  • Architecture [1 post]
  • Art and Politics [13 posts]
  • Art as a Profession [1 post]
  • Art Criticism [9 posts]
  • Art History Anecdotes [5 posts]
  • Art History Timeline [3 posts]
  • Art Practice [9 posts]
  • Art's Place in Society [27 posts]
  • Artspeak 101 [6 posts]
  • Ateliers [10 posts]
  • Book Reviews [1 post]
  • Canvas Priming or Preparation [1 post]
  • College Activism: Return to Realism [52 posts]
  • College Curricula [9 posts]
  • Commentary on Specific Artists [33 posts]
  • Definitions of Art [8 posts]
  • Digital Art [20 posts]
  • Discussion: William Bouguereau [3 posts]
  • Exhibitions [5 posts]
  • Fine Art and Photography [5 posts]
  • Freedom of Expression [6 posts]
  • Frequently Asked Questions [30 posts]
  • Funding for the Arts [1 post]
  • Good Art Versus Traditionalism [1 post]
  • Hockney Completely Refuted [53 posts]
  • Illustration as a Fine Art [27 posts]
  • Impressionism vs Academism [5 posts]
  • Juries and Competitions [1 post]
  • Letters to ARC [472 posts]
  • Life of an Artist [7 posts]
  • Modernist Heroes Reconsidered [62 posts]
  • Modernist Orthodoxy on Campus [4 posts]
  • Moral Relativism [1 post]
  • Music and Art [2 posts]
  • Myth & Religion in Art [7 posts]
  • Nudity [1 post]
  • Paint Pigments [8 posts]
  • Perspective [2 posts]
  • Picasso: Discussion by experts [14 posts]
  • Places to See [1 post]
  • Post of the Week [2 posts]
  • Realism on the Rise [2 posts]
  • Regarding GoodArt and ARC [10 posts]
  • Renaissance Art [1 post]
  • Responses to ARC [4 posts]
  • Scholarship [1 post]
  • Sculpture [1 post]
  • Setting up the Studio [6 posts]
  • Students at non-ARC Approved schools [1 post]
  • Technical questions discussed and answered [6 posts]
  • Techniques: Art Manuals [1 post]
  • Techniques: Draughtsmanship [33 posts]
  • Techniques: Oil Painting [80 posts]
  • Techniques: Sculpture [2 posts]
  • The Case of Pete Panse [4 posts]
  • The Marketplace [19 posts]
  • The Origins of Modernism [6 posts]
  • What is Art? [24 posts]

  • Knowledge and Context

    by Brian K. Yoder

    On Apr 18, 2006, at 12:45 PM, Jeffery wrote:

    For the record, I ask that question regularly because I think the answer is revealing. I, too, believe in the existence of absolutes, and think that the problem with much of today's culture is the sacrifice of belief in absolutes on the altar of radical freedom, with disastrous results.

    I think that like many of the intellectual problems in contemporary society this arises from a widespread misunderstanding of a philosophical issue. In this case, it leads all the way back to Hume and Kant. The error is in believing that absolute knowledge is knowledge with no properties of any kind...no person who knows it, no method by which it is known, no context within which it is true, no degree of accuracy within which is it true, etc. Of course they can never prove that these kinds of requirements apply (and if they somehow did, they would be making yet another absolute claim in addition to their original one), but that doesn't seem to slow them down at all. That's because this whole approach to thinking is not intended to help us understand the truths of the world, it is designed to let people get away with putting forth false claims without being held accountable for the error.

    For example, if I said that the mass of the Sun is greater than the mass of my little finger, some wise ass is bound to assert that it is impossible to know the mass of either one because I don't have the capability to determine exactly how many atoms are in each and that any measure of mass would necessarily be an estimate so that while it is very likely that such an estimate is correct, one can never know absolutely for sure that it is so.

    Back in the old days they used to call this "sophistry" and teach kids to spot it and avoid it. Today it is taught as the height of wisdom and sophistication, just as an aesthetic taste for excrement and splatters is taught in art as the true mark of the aesthetic sense. These are just different aspects of the same intellectual problem...in much of academia the pursuit of error, excuse, and evasion has taken the place of the search for the truth.