Jehan Georges Vibert

{"Id":134,"Name":"Jehan Georges Vibert","Biography":"\u003Cp\u003EIn describing Jehan Georges Vibert, an admirer of his wrote this: \u0022One of the most original artists that Le Roux introduced to me is Vibert [.] He is middle-sized, stout for his age, -- for he seems only thirty-five, -- has a full, merry, happy, but very shrewd, sensible face; he loves work, and is, as are all these men, an indefatigable, untiring worker, but he loves also to take his play-hours. In the evening he goes to the, theater, and among his friends and himself removes his thoughts from his work and his studio.\u0022[1]\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003EThe cheerfulness, playfulness, and hint of shrewdness she describes in Vibert\u0027s character are traits that would also distinguish his works and make his reputation.\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003EHe was born on September 30th , 1840 in France. In his early years he was trained under Barrias and on April 4th, 1857, entered the Ecole des Beaux Arts. During the early part of his career he painted rather serious and dramatic subjects, such as \u0022The Death of Narcissus\u0022 and \u0022Christian Martyrs in the Lion pit.\u0022[2] He entered the Salon in 1863; found his first success with a medal at the 1864 salon, and won a financial prize at the universal exposition of 1867.\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003EAround 1867, however, his style changed and instead of the dramatic and serious, he started painting \u0022small things and niggling.\u0022[2] Instead of heroic Christians and tragic mythology, he turned to more homey subjects such as \u003Cem\u003EThe Barber of Ambulart\u003C/em\u003E.\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003EIn 1870, while Paris was under siege to the Prussians, Vibert fought and was wounded at the battle of Malmaison. His courage, though, earned him the honor of being made a Knight of the Legion of Honor.\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003EThough he was himself a hero, his growing attraction to the less serious subjects of genre did not ebb. Instead, it was stimulated by his interests in comedy and satire. Not only did he enjoy taking a break from work to go out to plays, but he also wrote several comedies, many of which were successfully produced at Paris theaters such as the Vaudeville. As well as from his own comedies, he gathered subject matter from the French fabulist Lafontaine (of whom he had a bust in his house)[1], and the satirist Jonathan Swift.\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003EIn 1878 he achieved his first popular success with a huge history painting. \u0022The Apotheosis of Mr. Thiers\u0022 was the talk of Paris even before it was completed.[1] However, in spite of the success of this painting, he would spend most of his creative time on the humorous scenes that he enjoyed.\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003EDuring the later part of his life, his interest turned to the clergy.[1] Paintings such as \u003Cem\u003EThe Fortune Teller\u003C/em\u003E, \u003Cem\u003EThe Diet\u003C/em\u003E, and \u003Cem\u003EMonk picking radishes\u003C/em\u003E satirized the clergy\u0027s irreligious indulgences or depicted them in homey situations to an audience used to seeing the church ennobled in traditional religious and historic works. These would be the paintings that would make his reputation.\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003EIn 1882, he was promoted to Officer of the Legion of Honor, for his painting this time. This growing reputation would make him one the the most sought after atelier masters at the Ecole des Beaux Arts. This would lead him to being one of the seven most influential artists of his time, along with Bouguereau, Cabanel, Meissonnier, G\u0026eacute;r\u0026ocirc;me, Bonnat, and Lefebvre.[3]\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003EHe died suddenly of heart disease on July 28th 1902.\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003ELooking at his satiric work of the clergy in a broader historical context, one can detect that they are \u0022representative of the liberties emmanating from Enlightenment thinking that led to the world and culture shifting events of the American and French Revolutions. To spoof the clergy,\u0022 as ARC Board Chairman, Fred Ross, explains \u0022would have been to risk your life or imprisonment a century earlier, or even currently in Rome where Papal power was still at great strength.\u0022\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\u0022Thus Vibert was part of the growing democratization of Europe in which the artists and writers of the time were exposing the fraud and pomposity of big government and a hypocritical clergy that talked about walking in the shoes of the fisherman, and giving for god all worldly goods, while they themselves lived in the height of oppulance and luxury in great mansions with servants waiting on their every whim.\u0022\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\u0022\u003Cem\u003EThe Fortune Teller\u003C/em\u003E (\u003Cem\u003ETireuse des Cartes\u003C/em\u003E) is a particularly powerful example. What could be a greater spoof on holier-than-thou clerics, than to have two Cardinals soliciting the services of a prognosticator.\u0022 In a late ninteenth century society that was still bearing the fruit of the Enlightenment, it is no wonder that Vibert\u0027s wit and satire could flourish and be valued.\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003EIn 1902 an important technical book was published by Vibert call La Science de la Peinture. Very hard to find, this book is one of several from the period that is widely sought by contemporary realists who are trying to resuscitate the techniques and accomplishments of the past, so that future creativity and experimentation can be built on the solid foundation of the masters.\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003E\u0022His works are in the collections of many major and minor museums including: Bordeaux, Brooklyn, Buffalo, Chicago, Cincinnati, Glasgow, Melbourne, New York, Rochefort, Saint Louis, Troyes, Versailles and Washington D.C. He was recently one of several featured artists (including 30 of is works) in a traveling exhibition called \u003Cem\u003ECavaliers and Cardinals: Nineteenth Century French Anecdotal Paintings\u003C/em\u003E that was curated by Eric M.Zafran along with a full color catalog published by the Taft Museum in Cincinnati. It went to 3 museums, including the Corcoran Gallery of Art in Washington and the Arnot Art Museum in Elmira New York between June 25, 1992 and January 17, 1993. His paintings can be found in many important private collections, including three works in that of the [ARC] Board Chairman and his wife, \u003Ca href=\u0022https://www.artrenewal.org/articles/2000/Ross_Collection/ross.html\u0022\u003EFred and Sherry Ross\u003C/a\u003E.\u0022 (FR)\u003Cbr /\u003E\u003Cbr /\u003EFootnote 1: Letter from Mrs. Brewster of Rome. \u003Cem\u003EArtists of the Nineteenth Century and Their Works\u003C/em\u003E. Clara Erskine Clement and Lawrence Hutton. 1969 (originally 1877), North Point Inc., St. Louis.\u003Cbr /\u003EFootnote 2: \u003Cem\u003EBryan\u0027s Dictionary of Painters and Engravers\u003C/em\u003E. M. Bryan. 1910, George Bell and Sons, London.\u003Cbr /\u003EFootnote 3: Published speech by Fred Ross. Originally given at the University of Memphis, December 1st, 1998.\u003C/p\u003E\r\n\u003Cp\u003E\u0026nbsp;\u003C/p\u003E","Awards":null,"HasAlbums":false,"HasPortraits":true,"HasRelationships":true,"HasArticles":false,"HasDepictedPlaces":false,"HasLetters":true,"HasLibraryItems":true,"HasProducts":false,"HasSignatures":false,"HasVideos":false,"HasMapLocations":true,"TotalArtworks":61}